Beyond the harmful consequences of exclusion in the life of the individuals, they also contribute to aggravate the conflict between peoples. The powers are richer and poor the poor countries are each time. The control on the technological advances is not accessible to the delayed countries more, deepening the differences and the disparidades. Although they have been more developed and disponibilizados medias, we witness an increasing isolation of the individuals, of form that the socialization alternatives have been, paradoxicalally, reduced. The exclusion of many groups in the society and the separation between social classes has contributed so that so divulged integration between different peoples if it does not accomplish, for the opposite, this has led to a process of atomizaton of the society. The value is breaks up in it, in way that the enrollment politician of the majority occurs of isolated form as, for example, the feminism, the ambientalista movement, movements against the ethical and sexual discrimination, etc. Everything this without if it perceives a conducting wire that can unify the isolated fights in a collective project of society.
Therefore, it is of our interest that let us understand the Globalization mainly, the Digital Globalization, so that let us observe both the proportionate faces for it: the exculpatory side and the inclusion. , By means of research thus proceeded from reflections, we look the attainment of data that allows in them to arrive at an only conclusion on the Globalization: would be it, really, global? (Gilson Pags Landmarks – Professor of Geography) BIBLIOGRAPHICAL REFERENCES I LAND ON WATER, R.R. the Social Exclusion Today. Available in. Access in 24 of January of 2012. YOU PLOUGH, V. Digital Exclusion: what it is this? Available in.
Access in: 19 of January 2012. GALVAO. the Digital Illiteracy: And-Notice section of the site Astroroof of the Press, Edition 217, March 2003. Available in. Access in: 20 of January 2012. Neoliberal – economic doctrine that defends the absolute freedom of market and a restriction to the state intervention on the economy, only having this to occur in sectors essential and still thus in a minimum degree.